Independent? Please
Joe, be a good Democrat
and lose fair and square.
posted by ryan @ 12:38 PM
Haiku You Ku
You should relax.
Contributors
Links
- twentysevens
- switchback books
- the short poem anthology
- trinidad
- b-steel
- devil
- spike driver
- haiku anew
- haiku not bombs
- Wet Paint in the Kitchen
- RIP David Gemmell
- dude it's so hot
- welcome to the occupation
- the cosmic timeline
- Bowling in Reverse
- 99
- Speaking of Fondness
- They wanted me to reach out and give more, maybe e...
- short story transliterated into haiku
Previous Posts
3 Comments:
Woo! Woo!
The end of Joementum is nigh.
oh snap. according to george stephanopoulos, it gets worse:
According to a close Lieberman adviser, the President's political guru, Karl Rove, has reached out to the Lieberman camp with a message straight from the Oval Office: "The boss wants to help. Whatever we can do, we will do."
say it ain't so, joe
cheney cares, too! terror!
I know Joe Lieberman and have a good deal of respect for him given that we were opponents in the 2000 campaign; and of course, spent a fair amount of time watching the man and studying him over the years, especially in connection with our debate in 2000. And as I look at what happened yesterday, it strikes me that it's a perhaps unfortunate and significant development from the standpoint of the Democratic Party, that what it says about the direction the party appears to be heading in when they, in effect, purge a man like Joe Lieberman, who was just six years ago their nominee for Vice President, is of concern, especially over the issue of Joe's support with respect to national efforts in the global war on terror.
The thing that's partly disturbing about it is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task. And when we see the Democratic Party reject one of its own, a man they selected to be their vice presidential nominee just a few short years ago, it would seem to say a lot about the state the party is in today if that's becoming the dominant view of the Democratic Party, the basic, fundamental notion that somehow we can retreat behind our oceans and not be actively engaged in this conflict and be safe here at home, which clearly we know we won't — we can't be. So we have to be actively engaged not only in Afghanistan and Iraq, but on a global basis if we're going to succeed in prevailing in this long-term conflict.
So it's an unfortunate development, I think, from the standpoint of the Democratic Party to see a man like Lieberman pushed aside because of his willingness to support an aggressive posture in terms of our national security strategy.
Post a Comment
<< Home